Rural Dwellers and the Forgotten Poor

 

By

 

Victor E. Dike

 

 

“I wrote with tears and anguish, pouring into the pages all the pain that life has meant to me.”                                UPTON SINCLAIR

 

The poor rural dwellers (men, women, and children) are facing many challenges, but the government is not paying attention to their problems. Any person who treks around the remote villages will discover the myriad difficulties they endure. Many of them leave in crushing poverty and despair, as they are not sure of their next meal. In fact, one would be confronted with disturbing pictures of human suffering. With only some scattered bright spots, life in the rural areas is usually lifeless. Jobs are difficult to come by and able-bodied youths loiter around from dawn to dusk. Thus, because of diseases caused by lack of good water supply (very few can afford private water borehole), medical care, poor feeding, hardship and ignorance (many have slipped into superstitious beliefs) each day in some villages begins with stories of overnight death. Some would argue that there is poverty in every society. Yes! In many societies the governments have effective poverty reduction programs, but in the oil rich Nigeria where the politicians have unlimited access to the national coffer (some could bargain to be paid in dollar) the rural dwellers are the forgotten poor. This attitude exacerbates the poverty problem of the people.

 

 

The perennial fuel scarcity, bad roads that are barriers to movement of people and goods and lack of functional electricity that causes increase in the price of goods and services make the lives of the rural dwellers more miserable. Without modern and efficient refineries and sensible energy policy that ensure constant supply of fuel the price of petroleum products and other commodities will continue to ratchet upward. The Central Bank of Nigeria that has allowed the value of the Naira to depreciate is not helping matter; this has increased the prices of foodstuffs and social services and eroded the people’s standard living. Although the figure is in dispute, the Federal Office of Statistics (FOS) recently put the nation’s December 2003 inflation figure at 14%, up from 13% for November 2003. However, the CBN put its December 2003 inflation figure at 13.8%. No matter what the inflation rate might be the fact remains that high rate of inflation would wipe out the people’s saving and frustrate new investment (economic growth involve savings and investment). The apex bank should institute appropriate measures to improve the value of the Naira to boost the nation’s economic restructuring program, create new enterprises and employment.

 

 

There seems to be a sequence problem in the privatization program; a minimal level of social safety nets should have been established before selling off state-owned corporations. For lack of social services to take care of them the displaced workers would swell the poverty pool when they move back to the villages. Only the fortunate ones with rich and reliable relatives for assistance would escape the embarrassment of living in poverty. To avoid the economic restructuring program from creating increased poverty, inequality and rancorous society some social safety nets are urgently needed. Despite repeated promises of poverty alleviation over the years, the actual number of people living in poverty in the society seems to be increasing. With the unending corruption scandals in Nigeria, no poverty alleviation program will be successful in the society (or any other society) without controlling government waste and corruption, with some dose of transparency, accountability, and effective leadership.

 

 

Poverty destroys aspiration, and the poor rural dwellers have given up hope on the current leadership that does not seem to have any real plans for them. They are in the dark as to what the government at Abuja or their state capitals is doing. In fact, they are the forgotten group because they are excluded in the scheme of things. Fairness and principles of democracy dictate that there should be an equitable distribution of resources in democratic societies. But events of every passing day that add resonance to the plight of the poor show the contrary. Recent newspaper reports in Nigeria indicate that a couple of federal ministers are being paid unimaginable sum of dollars yearly while many other citizens live on less than 2 dollars a day (the state of the poor rural dwellers are more dismal). This shows that ours is a society of poverty for most and greed for a few! This writer does not begrudge the ministers of their jumbo pay, but some attention should be directed to the issue of “fairness” because the poor are not sharing in the gains of the nation’s billion-dollar petroleum economy.  It is beyond comprehension that the government that has the money for selective jumbo dollar salary payment has allowed regular wage and salary payment for poor civil servants at local, state and federal levels to fall into massive arrears. To avoid the peoples’ anguish, despair and discontents from degenerating into an uprising the leadership should begin to be responsive to the plight of the masses. The recent uprising in Haiti should serve, as a good lesson to Nigeria’s corrupt leaders, because the masses could revolt against any corrupt government that does not represent their interest. Everyone in the society should, in one way or another, benefit from the wealth of the nation. As Professor Joseph Stiglitz rightly noted in Globalization and its Discontents “development is about transforming societies, improving the lives of the poor, enabling everyone to have a chance at success and access to health care and education.” Sadly, or many years the leaders have allowed the educational and health institutions and socioeconomic infrastructure to deteriorate to the point of total collapse. Yet, these are among the prerequisites for an enabling environment for sustainable development and democracy.

 

 

To improve the lot of the people there is need for laws that would prevent the leaders at local, state, and federal levels from abusing their powers. Local councils that are closer to the people have been crippled, because the political leaders are reaching beyond their domain. This attitude has disrupted the little assistance (if any) the poor rural dwellers would be getting from their local councils. In advanced democracies powers are clearly defined and leaders are conscious of their boundary. Communities compete among themselves in luring foreign and local investors and each locality is known for what it produces. And the managers’ of corporations’ work tirelessly to fructify the enterprises they manage. Unfortunately, ours is a society where managers keep extracting from their organizations until they collapse.

 

 

The society should remove “incentives for asset stripping at every level” and adopt policies that would lead to national stability, job creation and true democracy, instead of the ‘predatory democracy’ that is currently in practice. And Nigeria must take charge of its destiny and not succumb to the dictates of the international financial institutions (IMF, World Bank, WTO, etc) because some of their prescribed medicines for economic growth to the Third World Countries have, more often than not, pauperized them.  Nigeria needs well-educated, dynamic and visionary leadership and entrepreneurs that could create vibrant private sector and jobs, revive the dying middle class and reduce poverty in the society. If the society fails to learn from its mistakes, it will continue to be confronted with mass unemployment, poverty, and crime.

 

 

Therefore, the people need a workable humane government - one that is concerned about the plight of the poor rural dwellers. Many of the retired folks that make up the bulk of the poor in the villages are dying off, and the remaining few are hungry and angry because their contributions to the development of the nation are not being appreciated. The rural poor nursing mothers need assistance to provide better nutrition for their children. For that, the government should invest in human capital by helping poor women (especially those nursing new babies) and children from poor families. Vocational skills training (or re-training), and a program that gives out food (or coupons to buy food) like the food stamp and the WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) in the United States (that assists poor pregnant women and preschool children with juice, milk, cereal and infant formula), will be appropriate. If the children of poor families are well nourished there is a good chance that they will come to maturity without grave disadvantages. This could, ceteris paribus, translate into improvement in their productivity and their poverty profile.

 

 

And economic diversification and the guaranteeing of a minimum income to the poor and the unemployed can assist in poverty alleviation, but the present breeds of political leaders do not seem to care about the nation’s poverty problem. Many of them have their personal interests that are often at odds with those of the general public. However, if they really care about the people they should show it by providing good quality education and health care for all and set up effective social infrastructure, such as the ‘legal system that can enforce contracts and settle disputes and banks that can lend money.’ They should also promote the application of modern technology in agriculture for massive food production and protect the environment - the type of environmental degradation that is going on in the Niger Delta Area should not be tolerated. More importantly, some form of subsidy to the poor should be allowed; it is hypocritical that the West that recommends that the Developing World scrap public subsidies has varied forms of subsidy for its citizens.

 

 

Therefore, for the privatization program to achieve its purpose effective “institutional infrastructure” should be put in place. Without this “asset stripping rather than wealth creations” would result, as the powerful oligarchy and special interest will rape and pillage the society in the name of privatization. As some critics have noted, any country that is unable to provide employment, food and medical care to its citizens, and incapable of controlling crime, maintain its educational institutions and crumbling infrastructure, and the environment is really a ‘failed’ State. Finally, the poor rural dwellers that are not educated or trained in any valuable skills today will add up to the growing pool of the poor tomorrow. To break this circle of poverty the leaders must assume the responsibility of meeting the needs of the people they govern. Without this, only the divine intervention or mere luck would rescue the rural dwellers and the forgotten poor from the poverty trap.

 

 

Victor E. Dike, CEO, Center for Social Justice and Human Development (CSJHD), is the author of Nigeria and the Politics of Unreason: A Study of the Obasanjo Regime [London: Adonis & Abbey Publishers, Nov 20, 2003].

 

 

 

March 2004